Congressman Sensenbrenner Reintroduces Bill to Stop the Sexual Exploitation of Children

Today, Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner reintroduced the Adam Walsh Reauthorization Act, which would allow the protections of the Adam Walsh Protection and Safety Act to continue saving the lives of children throughout the nation. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner is a turd. he’s the typical white male ‘Facts Don’t Matter” rightist. He’s also the clown that introduced the BUILD WALL Act of 2017, another facts don’t matter bill.

How do we keep ending up with politicians of hate and not of humane improvement. Just another organism who wants a name in lights.

Aside from the idiocy of he law itself, I note that there is nothing in this bill that would expand on the original bill. Why even bother? (I’m asking a rational question. The answer of course is VOTES, which is an irrationally-rendered response, but I digress.)

In other news….

It is once again tomorrow somewhere meaning there this sentence was written yesterday.

Meanwhile elsewhere in a completely expected move someone, who shall remain nameless due to the obvious identity of relevance, has proven that from time to time with nothing better to do why not remind everyone they need think of the children again. Let’s not forget the world is a dangerous place that children must be protected from by reintroducing a law set to expire with no evidence it works as intended. Actually I would be willing to donate 1 dollar to congressman nonsense if he can personally prove this legislation prevented one instance of child sexual exploitation before it happened.

I find the following statement thought provoking, stimulating my Critical Thinking Skills.

“Additionally, there are also an estimated 100,000 fugitive sex offenders across the country who are unregistered or in violation of registry requirements.”

So there are 100,000 persons in America who have Not committed any further crime (for if they had committed further crime they would not be fugitives) and are Repentant & Law Abiding, perhaps even Productive Members of their Communities. So for all Practical Purposes all sexual offence laws & registry laws are In-Effective for targeting who in the future tense will be a Danger to the country. Clearly a waste of our Hard Earned Tax Dollars.

Here’s is another question Mr. Congressman of Effeciency, Pray Tell:
What is the penalty for the violation of a person being “Unregistrated” or the extremely Abtract term “In Violation of Registration Requirments”?

Answer: 10 year penalty of Incarnation !

Conclution:

The Honorable Gentleman wants to Take Tax Payer Monies to Round Up 100,000 US Citizens and Spend Future Coveted Net Net Tax Payer Money to support for 10 years in prison 100,000 plus US Citizens who Do Not violat any Criminal Law, in effect Self-Repentant, Self-Rehabilitated @No Cost To The Tax Payer.

Not to mention how this will affect the family & community who are Dependants of the Repentant Law Abider! – Whoops I mentioned it! The mind when enabled with Critical Thinking Skills produces many Interesting Questions.

Hopefully, the S.O. in Chief will subject this to the 1-in-2-out requirement.

What parts of the AWA were expiring that needed to be extended?

I just have to put this out there… Part of the reasoning the awa was created 11 years ago was becouse there was over 100,000 missing sex offenders. So your telling me in 11 years of the awa it has not brought that # down one bit? Hmm seems like it’s working. Also if there was 100,000 missing sex offenders wouldn’t you say in 11 years if the awa and it hasn’t caught one of those sex offenders that there not committing crimes? Becouse if they were than obviously that # would be down. I’d say the recidivism rate on us is 0 percent right? Sounds frightening and high…

Perhaps Trump will Drain Sensenbrenner from the swamp. There are a few changes to this issue of the AWA, Mostly to get more states to sign up for it. The guy doesn’t let anyone from the public that opposes it to speak at the hearing. I went to a past hearing, it was a waste of my time.

This is nothing more than another tactic to get people hysterical and fearful enough about sexual offense against children in order to get tough laws to pass which has done nothing good.